More than half of americans (56%) say same-sex marriage would go against their religious beliefs, according to a survey we conducted in march 2013 but about half of those who say that same-sex marriage goes against their beliefs also say that gay couples should have the same legal rights as heterosexual couples. Non-religious arguments against lgbt rights groups (non-marriage-related): please note that some of the arguments are more about for negative view of lgbt rights activism and less about arguments against lgbt rights per se. Nature-themed arguments against gay marriage say little about the societal institution of marriage but reveal a lot about the homophobia and heterosexism of those who present such arguments. Arguments in favour of homosexuality simply because a sexual union cannot result in children, it is not right to forbid any action that is a physical expression of genuine love homosexuals are. The most common and popular arguments against gay marriage, mostly religious in nature, are easy to refute because they're based on serious errors re based on serious errors the most common and popular arguments against gay marriage, mostly religious in nature, are easy to refute because they're based on serious errors in an attempt.
Same-sex marriage is the marriage of two people of the same sex i ask you again: cite studies, surveys, and international reports that demonstrate an overall decline in the society as a result of legalising same-sex marriage. No, there are not any secular arguments against gay marriage, and instead all of the arguments have come from a religious standpoint i believe that those who would consider themselves secular are predominantly in favor of gay marriage and have not produced any evidence against the gay marriage movement. Opposing gay marriage is rational, not religious convinced that reason and nature teach us the truth about marriage, we will continue to make arguments in the public square about the public goods of marriage, for no society or person can long thrive kicking against the goads of reason and nature.
Many of the largest us religious institutions have remained firmly against allowing same-sex marriage, including the roman catholic church, the orthodox jewish movement and the church of jesus christ of latter-day saints, as well as the southern baptist convention and other evangelical protestant denominations. Same-sex marriage has made it easier to discriminate against gay people in the us in 2016, legislatures will take on this issue, but the fights may get nasty religious non-profits, though. This debate about same-sex marriage is the latest outgrowth of a culture that for decades has been drifting from biblical standards of truth and morality the sexual revolution, for example, sought to bring legitimacy to sex outside of marriage.
Best answer: the constitution homosexual marriage isn't the issue though sooner or later a gay couple will want to get married in a particular church, maybe because one of their parents were married there the ensuing battle will pit the 14th amendment (equal under the law) against the 1st amendment. A non-religious case against same sex marriage non -religious arguments exist in each one of us, its the natural law, we know it instinctively tinker with the building block and the whole house will be weak, and eventually fall peter strzelecki rieth apr 29, 2014 at 3:27 am reply. Using non-religious arguments, a new book says that aberrosexual so-called “marriage” is just the latest in a social trend of rationalized sexual misbehavior that is undermining society and persecuting those who. Using non-religious arguments, a new book says that “gay marriage” is just the latest in a cultural trend of rationalized sexual misbehavior that is undermining society and suppressing those who object. The glbt community wants the law to recognise same sex marriage, not neccessarily the church if the churches don’t want to perform the wedding fine, but the religious argument should hold no ground against the legal side of things.
Prominent arguments against same-sex marriage have been based on history, tradition, human rights, and social scientific research into health and welfare the role of religion has been less explicit. Refuting anti-gay rights arguments laws which discriminate against gay people in marriage, civil protections, and parenting rights are commonly proposed at the state level, particularly in the southern usa engage in political activity that would violate a church’s non-profit status basically, every religious person and organization. Some people disagree with same-sex marriage solely for religious reasons but, again, as this article demonstrates, one can disagree for other reasons, without appealing to the bible, divine revelation or any religious authority.
Gay marriage is one of the most controversial issues in the modern world for the past thousand years, marriage has been recognized as the social union between a man and a woman in most cultures across the globe, homosexuality was viewed with disdain, and marriages between same-sex couples were forbidden. In rallying against the introduction of equal marriage, religious campaigners have frequently stressed that their objections are not driven by homophobia, and have deployed numerous arguments to demonstrate this. The christian right has a new strategy on gay marriage to say there was a lot of discrimination against muslims than they were to say with arguments for religious exemptions, white.
Further, there are strong and logical arguments against gay marriage/same-sex marriage from contexts completely separated from the bible one does not have to be an evangelical christian to recognize that marriage is between a man and a woman. On june 26, 2015, the us supreme court ruled that gay marriage is a right protected by the us constitution in all 50 states prior to their decision, same-sex marriage was already legal in 37 states and washington dc, but was banned in the remaining 13. Marriage exists to attach society's legal imprimatur to unions which are capable of bringing forth children, the care and disposition of whom is a matter of public interest.